Pourquoi les États-Unis ont répété les erreurs dans leur stratégie sur la Chine depuis la victoire de la Seconde Guerre mondiale en 1945?

Pourquoi les États-Unis ont-ils commis des erreurs à plusieurs reprises dans leur stratégie envers la Chine depuis la victoire de la Seconde Guerre mondiale en 1945?

Perché gli Stati Uniti hanno commesso ripetutamente errori nella loro strategia nei confronti della Cina dalla vittoria della seconda guerra mondiale nel 1945?


Why has United States made mistakes repeatedly in its strategy toward China since the victory of Second World War in 1945?

19452战 胜利以来,美国为什么在对华战略上1错 再错

- Thèse de Philosophie

- Tesi Filosofico

- Philosophy Thesis

- 哲 学论文


Hugo Aujourdhui

Hugo Oggi

Hugo Today

今日雨果


V1.000.2013-11-15


V2.000.2017-07-15


V3.000.2020-07-24

(在写,未完,直到本行消失)



法、 德、英、葡、日、美、等国,都是在{普世&民主}阵营,为什么美国对中国的国情认知较肤浅,屡次失误,而且其中有些是重大失误?

重 大失误:
1)1945 年,二战胜利后,没坚持【划 江而治】的 战略决策;

2)1971 年,没作出支 持蒋介石坚持中华民国应该留在联合国安全理事会’理事国的 战略决策;

3)1989 年,6 月4日北京天安门大屠杀惨案前后,&近30+年来,对中国太软弱

4)2000 年前后,不 讲原则地、草率地给予中国最惠国待遇 & 让中国加入WTO

。。。, 等等



为 什么会这样?


1)Système de langue | Sistema linguistico | Language system | 语系

The Communist Party of the Soviet Union's ideology, Marxism-Leninism, Stalin, & their disciples and grandchildren, are still in the westernh-language system, and it is easier for Americans to penetrate deeply and see through the essence; while CCP、Mao Zedong Thoughts, they put on the oriental language's coat, confuse the Americans.

You only need to look at 1 thing, in past 100+ years, how many of the top decision-making figures in the United States are Chinese language savvy?


苏共'意识形态,马列主义,列宁、斯大林,&其徒子徒孙,仍在西语体系里,美国人比较易于深入进去,看透本质;而中共'意识形态,毛泽东思想,毛泽 东,&其徒子徒孙,邓小平、习近平、等等,披上了东方语系'外衣,迷惑了美国人。

大家只要看1看,100+年以来,美国'高层决策人物里面有多少是汉语通?有多少是东南亚历史通?

/victor-universel-labo/invitation/invitation-2.html



2)Conscience | Coscienza | Conscience | 良 知

美国'宗教力量比较稳固,哲学力量很薄弱,不受重视。

小雨认为,只有{宗教 ∩ 哲学}交集才能产生良知,这1点,美国远远不如欧洲,得向欧洲学习,取长补短,牢固结盟。

/livre-blanc/philosophie/la-définition-de-la-conscience.html



3)Base économique vs superstructure (compris idéologie) | Base economica vs sovrastruttura (compresa ideologia) | Economic basis vs superstructure (including ideology) | 经 济基础 vs 上层建筑(包括意识形态)


1 Proposition | 1 Proposizione | 1 Proposition | 1个命题
2000 年,草率地给予中国最惠国待遇&让中国加入WTO,对中国民主转型的盲目乐观,对中国转型正义的懈怠疏忽,再也明显不过地反映了美国这种认 知&处理上的重大失误,及其所产生的 natural consequences & social consequences in global scale | 世界规模级的自然后果&社会后果。

1笔2000~3000名中国政治犯的交易,这是1个什么数量级的概念?这2000~3000名中国政治犯里面,很可能就有通晓中国国情、具备雄才大 略的旷世之才,栋梁之才,希望之才。

“In fact, President Obama once asked Larry Summers, once a member of his and Clinton's economic team, how China was admitted (WTO) with practically no preconditions.”(see Appendice-3)

小雨不禁要问:

“After China joined the WTO in 2000, between the monopoly capital from all over the world, with China’s totalitarian government & totalitarian party, have started a large-scale (math) intersection, among them there was no lack of collusions, resulting in 2000~2020+, 20plus-year natural consequences & social consequences in global large-scale.”

A forward-thinking theoretical & mathematical model, by means of that, can abstract above activities, can predict、forecast、constrain these activities.

In United States, there are so many Nobel economics laureates, there are so many professionals whose major is researching political economics. Why none of them proposed above-mentioned unprecedented forward-thinking theoretical & mathematical models?”

“中国2000年加入WTO之后,世界各国的垄断资本同中国的极权政府&极权政党开始大规模(数学)交集,其中不乏勾结,造成 2000~2020+年,20+多年,全球大规模的自然后果&社会后果。

1种前瞻性的理论&数学模型,籍此,可以对上述活动进行抽象化,可以对上述活动进行预测、预报、制约。

美国有那么多诺贝尔经济学奖获得者,有那么多研究政治经济学的专业人才,为什么没1个人提出上述亘古未有的、前瞻性的理论&数学模型?”

Original: http://my.cnd.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=2&topic_id=96783&post_id=3073625&viewmode=thread&order=0#3073625



4)The United States has almost no practical experiences in governing concessions in China, lacks first-hand knowledge of CCP、the corruption & backwardness of the Chinese government, and this may be the root cause | 美 国几乎没有经历在中国治理租界的实践经验,对中共&中国政府的腐败&落后,缺乏第1手的认知,这也许是根本原因

Of course, the United States was not very long since its founding, which is one of the reasons.

FranceGermanyBritainPortugalJapan & some other countries do have practical experiences in managing concessions in China.


当 然,美国建国时间不长,这是原因之1

法、 德、英、葡、日等国,都有在中国的土地上治理租界的实践经验

Original: http://my.cnd.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=2&topic_id=94831&viewmode=thread&order=0



5)The Cognition to the scale of 1 country | 对国家规模的认知

。。。


EOA

Natoue ne unatibus

Mauris urna purus rutrum vitae iaculis


Nestibulum laoreet risuis convallis consectetur in nuege. Naim placerat ulamce sollicitue duipretium licituin necerais feugiamt congue puru volutpat sucipit convallis anmegte alsqiu sevitae nulla libero tincidunt laoret convallis.

MORBI SEM

Sern soituin


Nestibulum lareo risu conis nuege naim placerat ulamce sm duipretiu licituin necerais feugiat a voluitpat suscipit convallis anmegte sevitae nulla libero tincidunt laoir placerat ulamce sollicitue duipretiu.


Nistibulum lareo

Fusce mauris


Nestibulum lareo risu conis nuege naim placerat ulamce sm duipretiu licituin necerais feugiat a voluitpat suscipit convallis anmegte sevitae nulla libero tincidunt laoir placerat ulamce sollicitue duipretiu.


Nistibulum lareo

Fusce faucibus porta ornare fusce baucibus leonisi pulvinar mattis praesent non nisl sapien.