|
★ Pourquoi les États-Unis ont-ils commis des erreurs à plusieurs reprises dans leur stratégie envers la Chine depuis la victoire de la Seconde Guerre mondiale en 1945? |
★ Perché gli Stati Uniti hanno commesso ripetutamente errori nella loro strategia nei confronti della Cina dalla vittoria della seconda guerra mondiale nel 1945?
|
★ Why has United States made mistakes repeatedly in its strategy toward China since the victory of Second World War in 1945? |
★ 1945年2战胜利以来,美国为什么在对华战略上1错再错? |
|
- Thèse de Philosophie |
- Tesi Filosofico |
- Philosophy Thesis |
- 哲学论文
|
|
Hugo Aujourd’hui |
Hugo Oggi |
Hugo Today |
今日雨果
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remarque: La plupart des documents de cette thèse sont restés originaux, même aujourd'hui. |
Nota:
questa tesi, la maggior parte dei materiali sono mantenuti
originali, anche adesso |
Note: This thesis, most materials are maintained original, even now |
注:本论文’大部分材料至今仍保持原始。
|
| V1.000.2013-11-15 V2.000.2017-07-15 V3.000.2020-07-24 V4.000.2023-01-25 V5.002.2026-06-25 |
|||
|
Préface Pourquoi? |
Prefazione Perché? |
Preface Why? |
序言 为什么? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
La France、l'Allemagne、la Bretagne、le
Portugal、le Japon、les États-Unis、d'autres pays appartiennent tous
au camp {Universel & Démocratique}. Dès lors, pourquoi les
États-Unis ont-ils 1 compréhension superficielle des
caractéristiques nation de la Chine & commettent-ils des
erreurs répétées, dont certaines sont majeures? |
Francia、Germania、Bretagna、Portogallo、Giappone、Stati Uniti、altri
paesi appartengono tutti al campo {Universale & Democratico}.
Perché, dunque, gli Stati Uniti hanno 1 comprensione così
superficiale delle caratteristiche nazione della Cina, continuano
a commettere errori, & alcuni dei quali sono errori maggiore? |
France、Germany、Britain、Portugal、Japan、 United States、other countries are all in the {Universal & Democratic} camp. Why then does United States have 1 superficial understanding of China's nation characteritics & make repeated mistakes, some of which are major mistakes? |
法、德、英、葡、日、美、等国,都是在{普世&民主}阵营,为什么美国对中
国’国情认知较肤浅,屡次失误,而且其中有些是重大失误? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erreurs majeures: |
Errori maggiore: |
Major mistakes: |
重大失误: |
|
1)En 1945, après la victoire de la
Seconde Guerre mondiale, la décision stratégique de 【Règle
en divisant le fleuve Yangtze】 n'a pas été maintenue; |
1)Nel 1945, dopo la vittoria nella seconda guerra mondiale, la
decisione strategica di 【Governare
dividendo lungo il fiume Yangtze】 non fu mantenuta; |
1)In 1945, after the
victory in World War II, the strategic decision of 【Governing
by dividing along Yangtze River】 was not upheld; |
1)1945年,第2次世界大战胜利后,
【划江而治】’战略决策没得到坚持; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)En 1971, aucune décision stratégique
n'a été prise pour soutenir
l'insistance de Chiang Kai-shek à ce que la République de Chine
reste membre du Conseil de Sécurité des Nations Unies; |
2)Nel
1971 non fu presa alcuna decisione strategica a sostegno
dell'insistenza di Chiang Kai-shek affinché la Repubblica di
Cina rimanesse membro del Consiglio di Sicurezza delle Nazioni
Unite; |
2)In
1971, no strategic decision was made to support
Chiang Kai-shek's insistence that the Republic of China should
remain the member of the United Nations Security Council; |
2)1971年,没作出
支持蒋介石坚持中华民国应该留在联合国安全理事会理事国’战略决策; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)1989-06-04,
before
& after Tiananmen Square massacre in Beijing, & for
the following 30+ years, United States has been too soft on
China; |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)Aux alentours de l'an 2000, sans
aucun principe, on a accordé hâtivement à la Chine le traitement
de “Clause de la nation la plus favorisée”, & on a autorisé
la Chine à rejoindre l'Organisation mondiale du commerce; |
4)Intorno
all'anno 2000, senza
alcun principio, alla Cina fu frettolosamente concesso il
trattamento previsto dalla “Clausola della nazione più
favorita”, & ha permesso alla Cina di aderire
all'Organizzazione mondiale del commercio; |
4)Around
year 2000, without
principle, hastily granted China Most favoured nation
(MFN) treatment, & allowed China to join World Trade
Organization; |
4)2000年前后,
不讲原则地、草率地给予中国最惠国待遇 & 让中国加入世界贸易组织; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)Lors des débats sur l'adhésion de la
Chine à l'Organisation mondiale du commerce, il
n'a pas été convenu d'inclure dans l'accord commercial une
condition proposée par le Congrès, à savoir que le PCC modifie
le sort de 2,000 ~ 3,000 prisonniers politiques chinois; |
5)Durante
il dibattito sull'adesione della Cina all'Organizzazione Mondiale
del Commercio, non
si è raggiunto un accordo per includere nell'accordo commerciale
una condizione proposta dal Congresso, ovvero che il PCC
cambiasse il destino di 2,000 ~ 3,000 prigionieri politici
cinesi; |
5)During
the debate over China's accession to the World Trade
Organization, it
was not agreed to include in the trade agreement a condition
proposed by Congress, namely, that CCP change the fate of
2,000 ~ 3,000 Chinese political prisoners; |
5)在关于中国加入世界贸易组织’辩论中,
未同意在贸易协议中加入国会提出’条件,即要求中共改变 2,000 ~ 3,000 中国政治犯’命运; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
..., etc |
...,
etc |
..., etc |
。。。, 等等 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pourquoi? Voici 5+ raisons. |
Perché?
Ecco 5+ motivi. |
Why? Here
are 5+ reasons. |
为什么? 这里是 5+ 个原因。 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excerpted from: | |||
|
1 Système de langue |
1 Sistema linguistico |
1 Language System |
1 语系 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soviet Communist Party's ideology, Marxism-Leninism, Lenin, Stalin, & their followers, remains within the Western language system, it is easier for Americans to delve into , understand its intrinsic essence. |
苏共'意识形态,马列主义,列宁、斯大林,&其徒子徒孙,仍在西语体系里,
美国人比较易于深入进去,看透其内在本质; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
En revanche, l'idéologie du Parti
communiste chinois (PCC), la pensée de Mao Zedong, Mao Zedong,
& ses disciples、descendants, Deng Xiaoping、Xi Jinping, etc.,
se sont drapés dans le manteau du “système linguistique oriental”,
trompant ainsi les Américains. |
Al contrario, l'ideologia del Partito Comunista Cinese (PCC), il
pensiero di Mao Zedong, Mao Zedong, & i suoi
seguaci、discendenti, Deng Xiaoping、Xi Jinping, ecc., si sono
mascherati da “sistema linguistico orientale", ingannando così gli
americani. |
In contrast, Chinese
Communist Party - CCP's ideology, Mao Zedong Thought, Mao
Zedong, & his followers、descendants, Deng Xiaoping、Xi
Jinping, etc, have donned the cloak of “Eastern language
system”, thus deceiving Americans. |
而不同’是,中共'意识形态,毛泽东思想,毛泽东,&其徒子徒孙,邓小平、习近平、等等,披上了东方语系'外衣,迷惑了美国人。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just take 1 look: over the past 100+ years, how many of the top decision-makers in United States are Chinese language savvy? How many are knowledgeable about Asian history? |
不妨看1看:过去100+年里,美国高层决策者中有多少人精通汉语?又有多少人了解亚洲历史? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avez-vous remarqué : Dans ce monde, il
y a misinterpretations、misunderstandings、conflicts、even guerres,
du point de vue de la connaissance profonde de l'être humain,
leurs causes profondes sont toutes dues à une mauvaise
interprétation et à des malentendus dans le langage et à une
mauvaise interprétation et à des malentendus entre différentes
langues, que ce soit sous forme verbale ou écrite, qu'elle soit
explicite ou implicite. |
Avete notato: In questo mondo, ci sono
fraintendimenti、incomprensioni、conflitti、persino guerre, dal
livello di cognizione profonda del punto di vista dell'essere
umano, le loro cause principali sono tutte dalla lettura errata e
dai malintesi nel linguaggio e dalla lettura errata e dai
malintesi tra lingue diverse, non importa in forma verbale o in
forma scritta, non importa in forma esplicita o implicita |
Have you noticed: In
this world, there are
misinterpretations、misunderstandings、conflicts、even wars, from
deep cognition level of human being point of view, their root
causes are all from misreading & misunderstandings in
language & misreading & misunderstandings among
different languages, no matter in verbal form or in written
form, no matter in explicit or implicit. |
您注意到没有,在这世界上,存在着’种种误会、误解、冲突、乃至战争,从人类’认知深层来讲,其根源,皆起始于语言上’误读&误解,以及各语种之间’误
读&误解,无论是从言语形式或书面形式开始,无论是显式或隐式。 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excerpted from: https://hugoaujourdhui.org/victor-universel-labo/invitation/invitation-2 | |||
|
2 Conscience |
2 Coscienza |
2 Conscience |
2 良知 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
United States, religious forces are relatively stable, while
philosophical forces are very weak, are neglected. |
美国'宗教力量比较稳固,哲学力量很薄弱,不受重视。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little
Rain believes that only the intersection(math) of {religion ∩
philosophy} can generate conscience. In this respect, United
States lag far behind Europe, should learn from Europe, muturally
absorb strengths & compensate weaknesses, forge 1 solid
alliance. |
小雨相信,只有{宗教 ∩
哲学}交集(数学)才能产生良知。在这1方面,美国远远不如欧洲,得向欧洲学习,互相取长补短,牢固结盟。 |
| Excerpted from: https://hugoaujourdhui.org/livre-blanc/philosophie/la-définition-de-la-conscience.html | |||
|
3 Base économique vs superstructure (compris idéologie) |
3 Base economica vs sovrastruttura (compresa ideologia) |
3 Economic basis vs superstructure (including ideology) |
3 经济基础 vs 上层建筑 (包括意识形态) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Proposition |
1 Proposizione |
1 Proposition |
1个命题 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2000, United States
hastily granted China “Most-favored-nation treatment”&
allowed China to join WTO. Its blind optimism about China's
democratic transformation, & its negligence in China's
transformation justice, clearly reflect United States'
significant mistaks on cognizing & handling of the
situation, & therefore result in global-scale natural
consequences & social consequences. |
2000年,草率地给予中国最惠国待遇&让中国加入WTO,对中国民主转型’盲目乐观,
对中国转型正义’懈怠疏忽,再也明显不过地反映了美国这种认知&处理上’重大失误,及其所产生’世界规模级’自然后
果&社会 后果。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 deal involving 2,000
to 3,000 Chinese political prisoners,what kind of scale grade is
this deal? Among these 2,000 to 3,000 Chinese political
prisoners, very likely there are exceptional talents、society
pillar talents、hope talents, who understand China's nation
characteritics, possess great wisdom & grand strategy, |
1笔2000~3000名中国政治犯的交易,这是1个什么数量级’概念?这2000~3000名中国政治犯里面,很可能就有通晓中国国情、具备雄才大略’旷世之才、栋梁
之 才、希望之才。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“In fact, President
Obama once asked Larry Summers, once a member of his and
Clinton's economic team, how China was admitted (WTO) with
practically no preconditions.”(see Appendice-3) |
“事实上,奥巴马总统曾问过曾任他&克林顿’经济团队’前成员拉里·萨默斯,中国是如何
在几乎没有任何先决条件’情况下加入世贸组织的。”(见附录3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patit Pluie n'a pas pu s'empêcher de
demander: |
Piccola Pioggia non poté fare a meno di chiedere: |
Little Rain couldn't
help but ask: |
小雨不禁要问: |
|
|
|
“After China joined the
WTO in 2000, between the monopoly capital from all over the
world, with China’s totalitarian government & totalitarian
party, have started a large-scale (math) intersection, among
them there was no lack of collusions, resulting in 2000~2025+,
25plus-year natural consequences & social consequences in
global large-scale. |
“中国2000年加入WTO之后,世界各国的垄断资本同中国的极权政府&极权政党开始大
规模(数学)交集,其中不乏勾结,造成 2000~2025+年,25+多年,全球大规模的自然后果&社会后果。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 visionnaire modèle théorique &
modèle mathématique, permet d'abstrait les activités
susmentionnées, de les prédire、de les prévision、de les
contraindre. |
1 visionario modello teorico &
modello matematico, ci permettono di astratto le attività
sopra menzionate, di prevederle、di previsione、di limitare. |
1 forward-thinking
theoretical model & mathematical model, by means of that,
can abstract above activities, can predict、forecast、constrain
these activities. |
1种前瞻性’理论模型 &
数学模型,籍此,可以对上述活动进行抽象化,可以对上述活动进行预测、预报、制约。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In United States, there
are so many Nobel economics laureates, there are so many
professionals whose major is researching political economics.
Why none of them proposed above-mentioned unprecedented
forward-thinking theoretical model & mathematical model?” |
美国有那么多诺贝尔经济学奖获得者,有那么多研究政治经济学’专业人才,为什么没1个人提出上述
亘古未有’、前瞻性’理论模型 & 数学模型?” |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excerpted from: http://my.cnd.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=2&topic_id=96783&post_id=3073625&viewmode=thread&order=0#3073625 | |||
|
4 Expériences dans la gouvernance des concessions |
4 Esperienze nel governo delle concessioni |
4 Experiences in governing concessions |
4 治理租界'经验 |
|
|
|
|
|
| United States almost has no practical
experiences in governing concessions in China, lacks
first-hand knowledge of CCP、the corruption & backwardness
of the Chinese government, & this may be the root cause
|
美国几乎没有经历在中国治理租界的实践经验,对中共&中国政府的腐败&落后,缺乏第1手的认知,这也许是根本原因 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| Of
course, United States history was not very long since its founding,
which also is 1 of the reasons. |
当然,美国建国时间不长,这也是原因之1 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| La
France、l'Allemagne、la Bretagne、le Portugal、le Japon & quelques
autres pays possèdent 1 expérience pratique en matière de gestion de
concessions en Chine. |
Francia、
Germania、Bretagna、Portogallo、Giappone & altri paesi hanno
maturato 1 solida esperienza nella gestione delle concessioni in
Cina. |
France、
Germany、Britain、Portugal、Japan & some other countries do have
practical experiences in managing concessions in China. |
法、德、英、葡、日、等国,都有在中国’土地上治理租界’实践经验 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Feng
Xuerong: La vérité sur les concessions: Combien de jeunes
patriotes naïfs ont été trompés? |
Feng
Xuerong: La verità sulle concessioni: Quanti giovani patrioti
ingenui sono stati ingannati? |
Feng Xuerong: The Truth About the Concessions: How Many Naive Patriotic Youths Were Deceived? | 冯学荣:租界真相,欺骗了多少天真的爱国青年 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Excerpted from: http://my.cnd.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=2&topic_id=94831&viewmode=thread&order=0 | |||
5 The Cognition to the scale of 1 country
Note: Following whole web page is Excerpted from: http://my.cnd.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=2&topic_id=96157&post_id=3068136&viewmode=thread&order=0#3068136
| ✐“Scale of 1 country” | “1个国家’规模”:: jinrong,这是个很有创建的想法,Shocking the world & breaking the vulgar | 惊世骇俗。 Re: 从某芯片大厂的独特视角,看中国为什么不受国际社会待见 -page-4 | |||
|
. 164 5340, cycle = x 2018-04-07 00:41 jinrong 写道: 估计,jinrong是读到了jouyang62关于“scale | 规模”的这段话之后的评论。jiuyang62 写道: jinrong,这是个很有创建的想法,Shocking the world & breaking the vulgar | 惊世骇俗。 To the nut of a shell, 这是有关 “Scale of 1 country” | “1个国家’规模” 的命题。 说到曹操,曹操就到。 说到毒奶粉,这就来了假疫苗。 这不,眼下, 13+亿人,活生生的13+亿人, 正在为 已经跨多省蔓延的假疫苗事件 而担忧,而愤怒! 2, 小雨关于“country scale | 国家规模”的思索 怎么解决地球上人口规模过大的危机? ★【小雨新概念】PA = {poids * (Σ de la population / Σ de la aire de 1 nation)} 就中国面临的“country scale | 国家规模”问题而言,小雨提出了“划江而治”,及其“共产党让出福建省 Peace Solution” 。 3, 100年前,普列汉诺夫就“country scale | 国家规模”作出的预言 普列汉诺夫在1918年,九十多年前对“国家”的预言让我无比折服:“国家作为不可调和的阶级矛盾的产物,作为政治权威机构,作为一个阶级压迫另 一个阶级的工具当然将不再存在。有朝一日阶级将消失,国界将消失,而国家作为人民(将来是地球人)的组织形式将保留下去,不仅如 此,它的作用将逐渐增大,这是全球问题增加的结果,这些问题是:地球上人口过剩,地球资源枯竭,能源短缺,森林和耕地的保护,土地、水和大气的污 染,同自然灾难的斗争,等等。 随着狭义上的国家的消亡,在管理国家方面学者将起越来越大的作用,也就是政治上层建筑开始逐渐变为“学术权威”的上层建筑。。。” 周五植树:栽一棵“普列汉诺夫”树,上面写着他1918年留下的预言 来源: 学飞的蜂鸟 于 2008-11-11 http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/archive/2008/france/75497.html 4, 人类关于“country scale | 国家规模”的实践 在现实中,欧盟,有 0.5b | 5+亿人口,而欧盟成员国,没有1个是超过 0.1b | 1亿人口的,申根公约成员国之间,已经实现了取消边境检查,国界近乎消失,人口自由流动,人才自由流动,而国家的职能继续保留&增强。 英国(62m | 6千2百万人口)脱欧盟又是1个人类进行规模实践的例子。其后果是好是坏,众说纷纭,然而,这个现象在客观上是体现了国家规模的收缩&调整。当然,英国人,以后要 是肠子悔青了,还可以打报告申请再回到欧盟嘛 HDI | 人类发展指数, 联合国每年评出的最适合人类居住的国家, 联合国每年评出的世界幸福指数, 基尼系数(美,俄,中,贫富差距都超过了“警戒线” - 0.4,其中,尤以中国为最差), 世界文化地图(见参考文献),。。。 还有不少其它全球性的评估指标,待小雨找出&补充。。。 大家1定注意到了,在这些评估指标里名列首10名的国家,大多位于欧洲,澳洲,& 加拿大,这些国家均不超过 0.1b | 1亿人口。 5, wen6lucky在这里讲的是1个哲学上的重要命题:经济基础 vs 上层建筑之间的作用&反作用 6, 总之,让我们大家 解放思想,大胆立论,仔细论证,认真实践。 本帖同时发表在万维读者网上,招蜂引蝶: ★【全球人口危机】“中国应该分成13个国家,美国分成3个国家” http://bbs.creaders.net/politics/bbsviewer.php?trd_id=1340257 ◉ Référence | Riferimento | Reference | 参考文献 【惊堂木哲学】“制度和文化”(世界文化地图) 古依度·塔贝利尼(三稿) (2011-10-26 23:37:33) http://blog.wenxuecity.com/myblog/55861/201110/27189.html 大家1定注意到了,在这地图上,名列前茅的国家,大多位于欧洲,澳洲,& 加拿大,这些国家均不超过 0.1b | 1亿人口。 Institutions and Culture
November 2007 - SSRN Electronic Journal 6(3) DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1031915 Source - RePEc Authors: Guido Tabellini, Bocconi University Download the original PDF file: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5112218_Institutions_and_Culture ![]() Cultural
Map of the World:: Trust & Respect
|
|||
EOA
Mauris urna purus rutrum vitae iaculis
Nestibulum laoreet risuis convallis consectetur in nuege. Naim placerat ulamce sollicitue duipretium licituin necerais feugiamt congue puru volutpat sucipit convallis anmegte alsqiu sevitae nulla libero tincidunt laoret convallis.
MORBI SEM
Nestibulum lareo risu conis nuege naim placerat ulamce sm duipretiu licituin necerais feugiat a voluitpat suscipit convallis anmegte sevitae nulla libero tincidunt laoir placerat ulamce sollicitue duipretiu.
Nestibulum lareo risu conis nuege naim placerat ulamce sm duipretiu licituin necerais feugiat a voluitpat suscipit convallis anmegte sevitae nulla libero tincidunt laoir placerat ulamce sollicitue duipretiu.